Difference between revisions of "Simple Power Flow Example"

From Open Electrical
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Consider the simple model shown in Figure 1, where a large stiff network supplies a constant power load <math>\boldsymbol{S} \, </math> through an impedance <...")
 
 
Line 65: Line 65:
 
: <math>||Z_{s}|| = \frac{V^{2}}{S_{SC}} = \frac{33kV^{2}}{800MVA} = 1.361 \Omega \, </math>
 
: <math>||Z_{s}|| = \frac{V^{2}}{S_{SC}} = \frac{33kV^{2}}{800MVA} = 1.361 \Omega \, </math>
  
Converted to per-unit values (on a 100MVA base):
+
Converted to per-unit values (on a 100 MVA base):
  
: <math>||Z_{s,pu}|| = \frac{||Z_{s}||}{Z_{base}} = \frac{1.361}{4.84} =  0.281 pu \, </math>
+
: <math>||Z_{s,pu}|| = \frac{||Z_{s}||}{Z_{base}} = \frac{1.361}{10.89} =  0.125 pu \, </math>
  
 
For an X/R ratio of 10, the source impedance is therefore:
 
For an X/R ratio of 10, the source impedance is therefore:
Line 77: Line 77:
 
: <math>\boldsymbol{S_{pu}} = 0.5 - j0.375 pu = 0.625 \angle -0.6435 \, </math> (angle in radians)
 
: <math>\boldsymbol{S_{pu}} = 0.5 - j0.375 pu = 0.625 \angle -0.6435 \, </math> (angle in radians)
  
Plugging the parameters <math>S = 0.625 \, </math>, <math>Z = 0.281 \, </math>, <math>\phi = -0.6435 \, </math> and <math>\theta = 1.471 \, </math> into Equation (1), we get the load bus voltage:
+
Plugging the parameters <math>S = 0.625 \, </math>, <math>Z = 0.125\, </math>, <math>\phi = -0.6435 \, </math> and <math>\theta = 1.471 \, </math> into Equation (1), we get the load bus voltage:
  
: <math>V_r = 0.8480 pu \, </math>
+
: <math>V_r = 0.9433 pu \, </math>
  
 
== Intuition for General Power Flow Solutions ==
 
== Intuition for General Power Flow Solutions ==

Latest revision as of 23:03, 23 April 2026

Consider the simple model shown in Figure 1, where a large stiff network supplies a constant power load through an impedance :

Figure 1. Simple power flow model (note that all quantities are in per-unit)


Suppose the load power is known and we want to calculate the load bus voltage . Unfortunately, this cannot be computed in a straightforward manner because the load is of constant power and thus the load current and impedance are voltage dependent, i.e. the load draws more current as voltage decreases. As a result, the load bus voltage is non-linearly related to the load itself.

Derivation of the Load Bus Voltage

Note that in this derivation, all quantities are in per-unit. Recall that the load complex power can be calculated from the voltage and current phasors as follows:

Suppose that we represent both the load power and impedance in polar coordinates, i.e.

Then the power equation can be re-written as:


Conjugating the terms in brackets and simplifying, we get:


Applying Euler's law, we get:

Separating the real and imaginary terms of the above equation:

Squaring both equations and summing them together, we get:

Simplifying and re-arranging the equation above, we can get the following homogenous equation:

This equation can be solved for the load bus voltage using the quadratic formula:

... Equ. (1)

Where

and

Worked Example

Suppose that the source bus has a nominal voltage of 33kV and a short circuit level of 800MVA at X/R ratio of 10. What is the voltage at the load bus if it is supplying a constant 50MW load at 0.8pf (lagging)?

The source impedance is:

Converted to per-unit values (on a 100 MVA base):

For an X/R ratio of 10, the source impedance is therefore:

(angle in radians)

The 50MW load converted to per unit is (by convention, a load with lagging power factor has a negative reactive power):

(angle in radians)

Plugging the parameters , , and into Equation (1), we get the load bus voltage:

Intuition for General Power Flow Solutions

We saw in this simple example that the power flow problem for constant power loads is non-linear (i.e. quadratic) and cannot be solved with linear techniques. This intuition can be extended to more general power flow problems. While a closed form solution was found for this simple case, the general power flow problem is typically solved using iterative numerical methods, for example a Newton-Raphson algorithm.