Difference between revisions of "Overhead Line Models"
(Created page with "== Introduction == This article describes the most common overhead line (OHL) models used in power systems analysis. By line models, we mean equivalent circuits composed of el...") |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Taxonomy of Overhead Line Models == | == Taxonomy of Overhead Line Models == | ||
− | {| | + | {| class="wikitable" |
|- | |- | ||
!style="background:#efefef;" colspan="2" | | !style="background:#efefef;" colspan="2" | |
Latest revision as of 14:29, 18 November 2020
Introduction
This article describes the most common overhead line (OHL) models used in power systems analysis. By line models, we mean equivalent circuits composed of elementary series and shunt impedances (i.e. resistances, inductances, capacitances and conductances). The calculation of these impedances (i.e. based on geometrical and material considerations) is covered elsewhere in the section on Overhead Line Constants.
So why even bother with having a range line models - isn't one enough? The problem is that there are several characteristics of transmission lines that complicates the modelling of lines, for instance:
- The line impedances are not lumped, but distributed continuously over the length of the line. The interaction of inductances and capacitances is therefore different when considering a line as having lumped parameters versus distributed parameters.
- The geometry of overhead line conductors / sub-bundles (phase and earth) are not always symmetrical and therefore, a single-phase, single conductor equivalent circuit is not always appropriate. In such cases, multi-conductor models may be required.
- For transient studies (especially those covering higher frequencies), the line parameters can have significant frequency dependencies (in particular the series resistance and inductance). For example, the skin effect leads to increased resistances at higher AC frequencies. This necessitates the use of frequency-dependent line models.
The factors listed above imply that the most accurate line model would have distributed parameters, be fully multi-conductor to allow for asymmetrical geometries and imperfect line transpositions, and capture the frequency dependencies of the line. Such line models exist, but they are relatively complicated and often, much simpler alternatives can be used depending on the application.
Taxonomy of Overhead Line Models
Line Model | Applications | Properties | Remarks | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steady-State (Frequency Domain) Models | Single-Phase Models | Lossless (L) Line |
|
|
|
Lossless (LC) Line |
|
|
|||
RL Line |
|
|
| ||
Nominal Line |
|
|
| ||
Distributed Parameter Line |
|
|
| ||
Multi-Conductor Models | Nominal Line |
|
|
| |
Cascaded Nominal Line |
|
|
| ||
Distributed Parameter Line |
|
|
| ||
Travelling Wave (Time Domain) Models | Single-Phase Models | Bergeron Line Model |
|
|
|
Frequency Dependent Line Model |
|
|
| ||
Multi-Conductor Models | Bergeron Line Model |
|
|
| |
Frequency Dependent Line Model |
|
|
Selecting an Appropriate Line Model
Key considerations for selecting a suitable line model:
- Application: what kind of analysis is being done? e.g. power flow, stability, EMT, etc. For static studies such as power flows, simple fault studies, etc, then steady-state (frequency domain) models are appropriate. Steady-state models are also suitable for dynamic simulations that are only concerned with electro-mechanical transients (e.g. transient stability and motor starting) rather than electromagnetic transients (e.g. switching and lightning studies).
- Line Length: simpler models can be used for shorter lines
- Load unbalance and Transpositions: multi-conductor line models should be used for longer untransposed lines and systems with significant imbalances
- Level of detail: is it a preliminary or a detailed study?
- Accuracy of input data: what kind of input data is available?